Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheBigDog
Originally Posted by TheBigDog
Hypothetical: Your vision of the future has come into being. There has been a majority mass conciousness change of the imperitive to share instead of want. We are a majority of planetary stewards. How do you deal with the dissodents? What is your solution to the minority who are not prepared to willingly comply with the new world order?
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MagnetMan
As to dissodents. I have faith in human nature. They will come around eventually. Truth ultimately prevails.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheBigDog
This is a chicken-shit bull-shit copout of an onswer that typifies your contribution to these threads. The vast majority of human history is based upon beliefs that your new world order would deem to be lies, and you just stay blissfully distant from that bold fact. You claim that the core values of humans are going to change, to evolve, but you cannot say why other than that you predict it as an evolutionary imperative. That is just not an adequate explanation. So I will try one more time.
How long will you evade this question? What is so troubling about trying to answer it?Bill
|
You have accused me repeatedly of rejecting any answer that I do not like. How about yourself? I had no trouble in answering it when you first asked it. What more would you like me to say that will satisfy you?
I have listed the logical sequence of evolutionary changes several times on various threads. I have even posted diagrams. I never said that our core values would change. Personal integrity, family and extended family values will always underpin human consciousness. I said that nationalism and capitalism and religious scripture, just like clanism and a farm-based economy and totemic worship in the past, would become passe - become part of our history - that those artificial Old Age values wil not play in the new world paradigm. In this new view an egalitarian global society, all working together to steward the home planet as a single family estate will be an evolutionary imperative. The individual does not become lost in this Nuclear Age of common effort - but infinitely empowered by the vast challenges placed on each of our unique gifts put towards a common goal that benefits high and low equally.
If my view of how this sequence plays out proves to be false, then so be it. At least it is a noble view. What more can I say? That I don't believe my own positive impression of the common responce to goodness in human nature, given the right encouragement? Am I not allowed to hold this view or try to share it because it does not agree with yours? Maybe if you spell out exactly what I am supposed to say, you will remove my present confusion.
