Science Forums 2

[KickAssClown]

Ok, This is a unified field theory, so if you want to calculate said pendulum I will refer you to the Classical or Quantum method. Your choice really.

Matter is defined as , such that all matter is charge-like, the difference between the two quantum of Charge being Chilarity. Mass is then defined by Charge. In classical physics this is alluded to through a series of equations, which I will not elaborate on anymore than I have so far.

My theorm hinges on a few things, one of which is Magnetic Monopoles. I believe I know where to look. I predict that all matter is made up of two particle types, the Neutrino and the Anti-Neutrino. I am at this time unsure of exacts but I am working on that, as it is a VERY complex problem. It's like trying to calculate a galaxy by hand, it's going to take a bit. I would like help to either prove or disprove my stated theorm.

I understand frustrations and disbeliefs regarding my purposed theorm, however I am at this point interested in having my math checked, as that is the chief purpose of this thread. The Theory is in place and will be explained but I must check the Theory against the Math, and the math is not completely finished yet.

Right now I am not going to attempt to substantiate, as I can't. i don't have the predictions at current, and I need help, not critizism. I am asking that people take a leap of faith and assume for a moment that I am correct, build the model, test it, and then ridicule it. It is not constructive in this stage to ask me to 'backup" my claims.

I would have to pour out every single source I have ever refrenced from, and just for starters my physics book is over 1500 pages. we can subtract about 600 for home work but that still is more than I want to type at this time. My Quantum Mechanics book is 651 pages long and VERY complex, the first 73 pages alone are simply on vectors and matrices.

It comes down to this. If you wish to refute my findings then you need to refute the totality of QT and GR. I simply followed through deconstruction, deductive reasoning, and dimensional analysis to arrive at the conclusions I present here. Admittedly they are not Mathematically tight yet, and it doesn't help that I seem to have miss placed the majority of my notes, but that is the current intention of my brain dump onto this thread for public scrutiny to check and double check my math.

It comes down to the force diagram, In dirac monopole theory there has to be two, one for each pole. My theory is that these two monopoles are the Neutrino and the Anti-Neutrino. My most reassuring "proof" at this time is the neutron and it's decay. The thing that differentiates a Neutron from a Gluon and a Photon is that it has a magnetic moment. My current theory regarding this is that the Neutron has a little buddy that orbits it, an Anti-neutrino. That it is held in a stable orbit by it's binding into the orbitial system of the other particles (which are like-wise made up of orbiting bodies of Magnetic Charge).

Over the past few days I have begun to realize that my original split into Electric and Magnetic maybe off or ill worded. That perhaps Electric is an illusion of the two equal but opposite Magnetic Monopoles.

I am sorry I don't have my math together enough to stop and explain in detail each facet of Physics and Quantum Physics respectfully. I am trying hard and getting nearly no help what-so-ever.

So please, help me.

Sources of information:
"Physics for Scientist and Engineers with Modern Physics 4th Edition, by Raymond A. Serway": as part of the Saunders Golden Sunburst Series
"Princibles of Quantum Mechanics 2nd Edition, by R. Shankar"