Science Forums 2

[KickAssClown]

The correspondence princible is preserved i can assure that. I use Orbitial mechanics to describe the workings of Sub-atomic structures. That is where this gets really complex is that we are a talking more than 9 body orbits.

Relativity is preserved, and with subsystems, where the whole system is unknown Quantum theory is preserved. All Quantum numbers are strictly conserved.

I admit the classical Departure makes for the most difficult part of this all, but it is nessessary to properly quantizes Charge. Also do not make the mistake of NET charge versus Absolute Charge. As mass is defined as a balance of the two Quantum charge types.

In classical physics the electric charge is only applicable for conventionally massed objects. The photon as I have repeatedly said is DEFINED by charge. They simply dimensionally cancel out, such that the NET charge of a photon is zero, classically.

Zero is a non-quantum number, and as such is not fully descriptive of the phenomena. Hence the symetric break of charge, by chilarity. Also the charge and mass of Neutrinos has not been measured directly, and if my symetric break is correct then the measured ELECTRIC charge of course will be wrong as it is once again looking for something that is dual charge. Like the Photon has zero, classical, mass, the neutrino has zero, classical, Charge. the truth is that the photon is mass 1, and the Neutrino is charge of Left handed chilarity -1. The Anti-Neutrino is charge of Right handed Chilarity such that it is +1.

Through this minor change the Forces all go to one. As my Force Diagram shows, I know it lacks math but It's a long road to figuring out exactly what's what.

I know my stuff, I have been researching this for five years. I have been studying that Physics book since I was a little over 9. The Quantum text is somewhat new. I may need to make adjustments for it, however this seems like a lesser concearn.