Quote:
|
The paper is writting in plain english with no use of formulas.
|
If so, then it is wrong at face value.
The Global Positioning Satellite system works.
Particle accelerators work.
Computers and semiconductor devices in general work.
The electricity grid works.
The Standard Model works.
Multi-nuclear superconducting pulsed Fourier-transform nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometers work.
There is not a single empirical contradiction anywhere at any scale in any venue. Unless you can propose a new experiment to falsify existing theory, what
you have is either horribly wrong or degenerately equivalent. Absent a predictive mathematical framework, it is irretrievably wrong while still sealed in its box.
"Therefore one absolute measurable amount of time, has passed from the birth of the universe until the present.
No. Trivially not. Go out at night look to the horizon and see a galaxy. Look 180 degrees opposite and see another galaxy. Neither galaxy is in the other's lightcone. Each of the two parts of the universe do not exist for the other part. Neither they nor you have a clock that can be synchronized with any of the two others.
Annalen der Physik 4 XVII 891 (1905)
Read it. Look up the difference between "space-like" and "time-like" events. Do the math.
----------------
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
