Quote:
|
Originally Posted by UncleAl
If so, then it is wrong at face value.
The Global Positioning Satellite system works.
Particle accelerators work.
Computers and semiconductor devices in general work.
The electricity grid works.
The Standard Model works.
Multi-nuclear superconducting pulsed Fourier-transform nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometers work.
|
Be careful not to make your statements out of context. I explain in the paper that I am not challenging the accuracy of Special Relativity or its predictions.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by uncle al
There is not a single empirical contradiction anywhere at any scale in any venue. Unless you can propose a new experiment to falsify existing theory, what you have is either horribly wrong or degenerately equivalent. Absent a predictive mathematical framework, it is irretrievably wrong while still sealed in its box.
|
I also point out that there should be no contractictions in observation or predictions or SR and Temporal Relativity.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by uncle al
"Therefore one absolute measurable amount of time, has passed from the birth of the universe until the present.
No. Trivially not. Go out at night look to the horizon and see a galaxy. Look 180 degrees opposite and see another galaxy. Neither galaxy is in the other's lightcone. Each of the two parts of the universe do not exist for the other part. Neither they nor you have a clock that can be synchronized with any of the two others.
Annalen der Physik 4 XVII 891 (1905)
Read it. Look up the difference between "space-like" and "time-like" events. Do the math.
|
My argument is that the universe has one age of 13.7 billion years, as your own links have pointed out (though you mistakenly reference it as 14.7 billion years). The universe as a whole can not have more than one age. Therefore, one abolute age has passed for the whole of the universe as measurements of the CMB show.
