|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Will 'Understanding' be Extinct by 2050?
Why is it nessecary that a large amount or knowledge compared to the same amount of understanding make it seem like a bad thing? Here, statistics is pulling it.
It is definitely true that the PhD people know vast amounts of info that are not quite understanding type (eg- the names of all the bones in the body, their parts, symphysis points, attachment points with muscle etc), but they will also have an amount of understanding along with it (eg how? why?)
Basically what I'm trying to convey is the fact that understanding will also be there, even though the ratio is different.
----------------
ronthepon, capitals avoided. 
And don't ask me why. |
