|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Cannabis and psychosis
You mistake. I did not say you were wrong, only that you implied something which was not implicit, and which I do not read when I read HB's post. When I read HB's post, I read I do so with it in mind that things do not tend to be in absolutes, so it may simply be my perception. However You take it to mean that it is 100% clear that the two are isolated. I do not see this directly or indirectly alluded to in HB's post.
my conclusion then must be that You have in your own perception taken what was said to the extreame, and therefore mutated the claim from his to yours.
At worse I would accuse HB of not being clear and of simplifying. The clarity part is important, the simplication part in a Cannabis and Psychosis thread is not, in my mind at least.
-Only by opening our perceptions do we see what is, with a closed mind comes no input and entropy of output
KAC
----------------
There are no truths in science, only the falsifiable hypotheses and explanations of the people who test them.
Hyper Physics
Hyper Math
Wikipedia |
