Science Forums 2

[KickAssClown]

Ok, so I am going to try and put into plain english my basics. Things which you people need to know to understand what I am getting at here.

First things first. The driving questions.

What is Mass?
What is Energy?
What is Matter?
What is Charge?
What is Force?
What is their relationship to one another?

The basic assumeptions:

Mass is derivide of energy.

The gram is then, not a fundamental unit but instead defined in terms of something else.

Energy is derivide of Absolute Charge distance over opposed Absolute Charge time.

c assumes the value of absolute charge and it's anti to be exactly equal and thereby cancelable.

All forces are derived of one force. (unified force)

No body is with an absolute charge of zero. All matter has absolute charge.

Classical charge is relative charge, or summed charge, and therefore not absolute.

Charge is quantasized, though this quanta is as of yet unknown.

All things are quantasized. At the fundamental limit, all things reduce to a minimum of 1. It is likely that there is a threshold limit also, by which no value can grow larger than, without shifting outside of our observable limits.

These are some of the more basic, though not truely fundamental ideas that have driven paradigm design. These assumeptions brought about and were brought about by some other key ideas from systematic study of various phenomena through out my references.

It is by virtue of the assertion that if all forces reduce to one force, then all phenomena must then derive from the same substance. Logical choice to me was the one we have best defined. Electro-magnetic in orgin, and characteristic of both wave and particle properties.

The photon, being thought of as a zero mass body of matter was a prime canidate for my fundamental, but it had a few issues with it. The Chief one being the question of it's divisibility. Most are not concearned with it, the general consensus is that a photon's Electric and Magnetic fields can not be seperated and could not propagate alone. Something about field regeneration.

However I couldn't ignore the intimate relationship that the photon shared with mass and space-time. So I concidered other phenomena which might give some insight into my investigations.

That's when I hit upon Monopoles. The issue of observing free monopoles has been so far, that in division of a magnet dipole, you end up with a magnet dipole. My conciderations were many. Of which was the question: "What happens if you split a photon?" I had something of an answer.

I would bet the result of splitting a photon, neglecting the details on how that would happen for now, would be a monopole. because what would result would undoubtably be irreducible. Which then hit on another dillema. How do observe that which is not mass or energy? The answer was in simple terms, you don't without tainting the purity of the body being observed. Heinsenberg Uncertainty and Dependent Observation.

So it seemed evident to me, from careful deductions, that monopoles would ultimately have to make up Matter and Energy.

I'll sleep on this and maybe add more in the morning.