Science Forums 2

[HydrogenBond]

When we get to 2-D, we are in the thought dimensional range of cause and affect. Thought dimensions higher than 2-D can be understood as rational drawings on the plane of cause and affect. If one rationally draws with straight lines they are making a rational drawing that uses only linear relationships, i.e, if 10-6=4, then 6+4=10.

Rational drawings can get fancier by using the curved lines of language memories to create very subtle and complicated rational diagrams. For example, if A+B=C, then C-B=A. The variables are curved relationships with many possible meanings, none of which are subjective. This type of drawing can also be done a la Sherlock Holmes with subtle variation of language and linear data to draw very sound rational diagrams with logical conclusions.

If one draws with lines, curves and subjective circles of prestige, it creates a whole different type of rational drawing. This occurs at the upper limit of reason at 2.5-D. It is a called a spatial image. It looks 3-D to the eyes but because it is draw on a 2-D plane of logic it is flat and therefore 2-D. The addition of the prestige circles to the rational drawing, acts like shadowing or highlighting to create the illusion of 3-D.

There is sort of an irony here. A 2.5-D memory contains a subjective element yet is rated higher in thought dimesion than pure reason. It sort of amounts to a social prestige enhancement being added to rational drawings to give then added umph.

Let me give an example. There are two political parties in America. They would not both exist if each was not expressing some of the truth. But both sort of take part of the complete data set of turth, and based on their narrowed data/truth set are able to draw rational drawings. That part of the reasoning is sound, if only half the data actually existed. The denial of truth in the other half of the data and the focus on their pet data is the shadowing and highlights that give the rational drawing a sense of depth. The depth comes from the emotional induction associated with the denial of the other half of the truth or the markets of thier half of the truth.This is actually a precursor stage to thought dimesions that are above 2.5-D. It is good to know how to do this.

Thought dimensions above 2.5-D can be understood as intuitive relief drawings, where depth of understanding begins to replace denial of truth. It actually begins to take on a third dimension that is more than prestige enhancement. For example, if one was a moderate, they may try to include the good points in both political parties. This increases the data set and takes away some of the emotional shadowing and highlighting. A moderate position is not always easy since compromises have often not yet been formed. The result can be an intuition that a compromise does exist, that will slowly take form in the mind. This stems from the spatial memory or 3-D memory within the right hemisphere.

Intutitions are similar to subjective prestige affects with respect to their emotional output, i.e, they way they make one feel. However, yhey are two distinct things at different thought dimension ranges. The prestige affect is conditioned subjective enhancement, while an intuition has personal meaning. Intuition is a fast memory signal often felt first with emotional valence. It is like a creative dam before the waters of thoughts begin to flow.

For example, two people may meet a new person. One person may not like them because they dress funny. This is an emotional assessment based on a conditioned prestige affect. Another person may not like them because they give off this strange vibe. This is more intutitive with the unconscious mind picking up something and outputting its dense/fast 3-D assesement as a uneasy feeling tone. They both appear subjective but the latter actually has a type of wisdom that is in touch with reality. If the stranger changed his clothes, the first person may now like him. While the intuition of the second person would draw the very same conclusion.