Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheFaithfulStone
Here's the thing about carbon from forest fires. The carbon got INTO those trees by coming out of the atmosphere.
Therefore, putting it back INTO the atmosphere is less of a disaster than putting carbon into the atmosphere that's been buried underground for 50 million years.
TFS
|
It doesn't matter where it comes from the fact is that greenhouse effect refers to atmospheric CO2. It claims that the CO2 in the atmosphere is significan't higher (according to ice core samples) than it has been in the past 400 years (not 400,000 as posted above) because they believe they can go that far back in their core sampling (of course there is no garauntee that they can positively identify a sample from say 1776 because that sample may have melted completely away to expose the previous years sample). They say that it is higher because of human industrialization. What has been provided here is evidence that human production is a drop in the bucket to the wildfires over the past 10 years.
Also the NASA site on the receding of the Polar caps on Mars, does not say anything about them receding more in recent years than in past years. It simply shows that every year the dry ice part of the caps recedes. If you can find a better study and site it that would be evidence against greenhouse effect global warming and for solar effect global warming, but that site in post 15 is worthless in this discussion.
