|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Explain Mass.
What I mean is, when there is no absolute, there is no way to decifer which object is containing all the motion.
One observer might measure an object traveling .99C , and another observer that is moving but always considered itself at rest, might measure it to be covering distance faster than .99C, and maybe beyond "C" . I've seen, heard, and read many versions of how to explain this. Some claim an absolute and others dont. Its not about do I understand it, its about, which way is the right way to eliminate all paradox's and errors(?).
|
