Ok, i finally have a day off to catch up on all this...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tinny
what is meant by frequent basis?
where do the reseachers get the source code of commercial software?
enough questions for now.
|
frequent basis = pretty much a few times a week, every time you download an update, several bugs within the code are fixed.
The companies that produce the software will share their code with research groups. WinXP code was released to some government agencies and research groups, as to other software, there's industry standards that are kept and the 20-30 problems/1000 lines come out of another research i think...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tormod
What would be a good Linux distribution to start with? I own a copy of Mandrake 9.
|
not mandrake, or red hat. Mandrake is a PPS (Package Packaging System), for a server, that is not what you need, and red hat is almost like "microsoft linux", its just so much GUI based, you can make a Red Hat box very nice, but you need to spend lots of time on it, if you want a real linux, setup gentoo or slackware...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pgrmdave
It doesn't matter which OS has fewer bugs, or even which is better. So long as more software is made for Windows, we'll have to suck it up and use it.
|
For 90% of the software in Windows, there is an equal and many times better solution in Linux, with the only difference that Linux solutions are free and open-source. The rest are games, and there are games written for Linux like UnrealTournament for example... And the security of the OS always matters!
Quote:
|
'm a gamer, if I didn't have Windows, I'd never have played some of my favorite games. Unfortunately, I am forced into submission by myself. If I support the better OS, I have no real reason to use my computer, if I want to use my computer, I have to support Windows, well, sort of, it's not like I actually PAID to use this version of windows.
|
that still doesnt explain why you dont support the better OS, the fact that a year ago i was just using windows does not mean that i havent been supporting Linux for the last 5... and you could get paid to use Linux, the cost of stitching from windows xp to gentoo is -$100, thats right negative 100 bucks, how you ask? Linux is free, you mainly pay for packages and support, well, gentoo is compleately installable with a broadband and a live CD that is free form their site, support is free, and there are 70,000 gentoo forum users, chanes are that something that went wrong on your system, has gone wrong before, so you can solve it, but you still have that windows right? You could return the cd key to microsoft and they are supposed to pay the refund for your copy of Windows, thats about $100 in your wallet. (an extra 100 bucks, imagine all the things you could get
...)
Quote:
|
I can't honestly say which OS is more secure. Even if Windows was more secure in its code, more viruses and spyware are written for it. Someone running Linux is less likely to have problems simply because it's not Windows.
|
The thing is, since Linux kernel is virtually uncrackable, you would have a real tough time writing a virus for it, all the 48-49 viruses ever written for Linux exploited wholes in programs that come with certain distros of Linux, not the system itself, just because it is that much more stable. Worms might be able to get to your system, but you need root access to do anything in Linux, and it is hard to get, not impossible, nothing is, but you need to know the system inside out to do this kind of stuff!
----------------
Microsoft, the leader in using innovative tactics to promote irksome experience, coupled with antiquated technology that's held together by a pyramid of makeshift afterthoughts.
Apple, the leader in using irksome tactics to promote innovative experience, coupled with an antiquated core that's enhanced by state-of-the-art afterthoughts.
Linux, the leader in not using any tactics to promote user-defined experience, coupled with state-of-the-art core enhanced by innovative afterthoughts.
