Go Back   Science Forums
View Single Post
Old 12-03-2006   #37 (permalink)
coldcreation's Avatar
coldcreation
Resident Bright


Location:
Barcelona and CT
 
coldcreation has much to be proud ofcoldcreation has much to be proud ofcoldcreation has much to be proud ofcoldcreation has much to be proud ofcoldcreation has much to be proud ofcoldcreation has much to be proud ofcoldcreation has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to coldcreation Send a message via Skype™ to coldcreation
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Origin of the Universe,,,,Bang or no Bang

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Costas View Post
Hello Coldcreation

I agree with that.

Some of those giant super clusters would take over 100 Gyrs to form. If not more.

The BB people somehow are in the mind set that the universe is 13.7 Gyrs.
Very true. According to my calculations, the observed superstructures along with the light and heavy metal abundances (too observed) would take anywhere from 250 to 600Gyrs to form.

Note that this hypothesis exclude the creation of elements and their isotopes primordially. That is there was no bang a very short time ago from which would sprouted the right quantities of material. The universe evolves like most things, very slowly.

We have stars in our own Milky Way that are older than 15Gyrs. In fact some of the ages older stellar components of globular cluster toward the center of the Galaxy were, a while back, estimated between 15 and 18Gyrs (probably an under estimation, the true figure should be around 20 to 25Gyr, possibly much more, say between 25 and 35Gyrs).

Even the lower estimate of 15Gyrs blows away the modern cosmology version of universal evolution, with its young age of 13.7.

Note also that the 1998 observation of the SNla to determine the rate of expansion placed the age of the universe at around 12Gyrs.

Several parameters had to be severely tweaked in order to make sure the universe was older than some of its components: notably, non-baryonic dark matter (supposedly composed of something unobservable, not electron, protons or neutrons) and the infamous dark energy (the combined total; 96% or so of the total mass-energy density of the universe).

Mainstream science has invented something more ponderous that itself.

CC


----------------
Coldcreation
Reply With Quote
 
» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:15 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network