Go Back   Science Forums
View Single Post
Old 02-11-2007   #368 (permalink)
malcolmf's Avatar
malcolmf
Thinking


Location:
England
 
malcolmf is a jewel in the roughmalcolmf is a jewel in the roughmalcolmf is a jewel in the rough
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Update on my pulverization experiment

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidgmills View Post
I had wondered whether the Amazonians had gone to the trouble of meticulously grinding up their charcoal as it seemed highly labor intensive. Maybe they did not grind it up after all.
You are right, David, they didn't. Nor did they bother spading it in. Recent thinking (Lehmann et al's Amazonian Dark Earths) is that Terra Preta, black earth, accumulated from burned waste from cooking fires and trash heaps around habitation, while Terra Mulata, brown earth, accumulated from in-field burning. TP may even have been made unintentionally, though personally I doubt that would have been true for very long once they saw what it did. TM seems to have been intentional: see previous post with evidence from Hecht & Posey on sophisticated uses of fire and mulching in present-day Amazonian agriculture, though this may not be precisely the same management regime as in the past. TM carries just as much carbon, but less phosphorus and calcium, which are what give TP extra fertility.

I'm not sure that we can hope to mimic the Amerindians exactly if we want quick results. But nor am I sure that going for quick results will achieve anything worthwhile. Are you regrowing the char you use? Has it simply been taken from a living carbon sink? Has your digging destroyed more soil carbon than you put in? Are you protecting the carbon so it does not decay?

We should all by looking for ways to answer these questions rightly. For the first, very cheap and IMHO worthwhile tree planting to replace char is available at the Oxfam Unwrapped site (click on Gifts That Grow). Still time to give as a Valentine's Day gift, though she might not think it very romantic

M
 
» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 30.00%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 40.00%
4 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 30.00%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 10
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:55 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network