Go Back   Science Forums
View Single Post
Old 03-16-2007   #5 (permalink)
Qfwfq's Avatar
Qfwfq
Exhausted Gondolier


Location:
Floating On An Ocean Of Hydrogen
 
Qfwfq has a reputation beyond reputeQfwfq has a reputation beyond reputeQfwfq has a reputation beyond reputeQfwfq has a reputation beyond reputeQfwfq has a reputation beyond reputeQfwfq has a reputation beyond reputeQfwfq has a reputation beyond reputeQfwfq has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Examining the Slit Experiment

Quote:
Originally Posted by KickAssClown View Post
That would seem to be the easy answer, but if you ask the question of if the barrier is massed, and mass is 90% empty space, then why doesn't the photon merely pass through the barrier?
Sure, especially if you use a barrier made of glass!

Quote:
Originally Posted by pgrmdave View Post
Perhaps there are reasons other than the possibility that the photon travelled through the slit, but then why would the presence of a slit have an effect?
Excellent! This is exactly the matter of the whole issue: If we hypothecically consider that the particle went through one of the slits, then why does the other have any effect?

Essentially, what the experiment shows is that there is something non-local about how the outcome is determined for each single particle. Quantum formalism describes this with great success but we don't understand exactly how the observable outcomes are determined.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boerseun View Post
What I want to know, seeing as we're discussing this particular experiment, is how on earth do they guarantee that a single photon was released in order to produce the results? Who counts photons? How do you count photons?
Basically, knowing the nature of the source and the typical duration of each emission, it's enough to have few enough emissions per unit time so that, given the length of the apparatus and therefore the time of transit, the great majority of them won't be overlapping. It's a statistical consideration. Today there's a variety of possible techniques for counting photons, when I was in fourth-year lab we used an old photomultiplier tube cooled with liquid nitrogen and a spectrometer to cast away most of the "noise" i. e. triggerings not due to a photon coming in. Technology does however offer some more refined things today.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boerseun View Post
I think there's a lot to the physical structure and properties of light that we don't fully understand yet. I'm actually of the opinion that light is completely different than what we think it is. But that's just me.
It isn't just a matter of light, it's about anything. Quantum formalism describes the way reality is, when things are in a coherent state.


----------------
Inutil insegnŕ al mus, si piart timp, in plui si infastiděs la bestie.

Hypography Forum PITA...... er, Administrator.
Reply With Quote
 
» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:56 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network