Trying to understand what you're doing so here goes:
Quote:
Originally Posted by KickAssClown
Quantum physics retains but refines this picture of the particle. I question the very validity of that model.
|
Why?
This is not a facetious question: I'm trying to get you to be explicit about what bothers you about Quantum Mechanics. Knowing you, I know that this is probably much more sophisticated than "it just doesn't make sense from my macroscopic experience of the world."
Quote:
Originally Posted by KickAssClown
What I am questioning is the results of a material experiment within which I believe that certain key factors are being neglected, such as the very structure of matter at it's fundament.
Neither Classical physics, nor Quantum physics give a satisfactory explanation (theory) of matter.
|
What makes Quantum theory's explanation unsatisfactory?
I think anyone who's studied it will agree its hard to grok that is well attested to by Feynman, and many others. There are certainly unknown boundaries of the standard model, and it definitely is hole prone when it comes to trying to integrate gravity, but claiming that its description of matter is incomplete is attacking it at its strongest and best-supported-by-data point!
So expound a bit KAC: what's your beef?
A wavy particle,
Buffy
