Science Forums 2

[KickAssClown]

I do understand the mechanics behind these things, I really do. What I have here is not a misunderstanding, but a disagreement. For you Drum, I would suggest you taking a look at the posts that I have made in the near past, particularly regarding the nature of photons, and matter. You can do that by clicking on my name next to my post and clicking the option "Find More Posts by KickAssClown".

Now to the simple reason why I should believe that the projectile went through the slits, as given by Boer. That if you cover the slits no pattern shows up on the otherside. It is not sufficient, in my view, to prove that the projectile went through the slits just because the coverings have an effect on the outcome of the experiment. Once again the reason comes from the structure of the experiment itself, and the structure of the coverings themselves.

I would acknowledge that the projectile get's detoured by the coverings, they create a new path of resistence and force the projectile to follow a path of least resistance. No interferance pattern on the otherside, because the projectile doesn't make it to the otherside.

That still does not prove that the projectile went through both, let alone one of the slits. As I said intially, there are other explanations for the outcome of the experiment. Just as there are other explanations for the CMB, and the Spiral Galaxy problem.