Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay-qu
This thread gives rise to an interesting paradox - for it is a discussion about nothing, but in describing nothing it must use something - to that end nothing has given rise to something..
|
Oh its easy to explain with Goedel's Incompleteness Theorem: you need to realize that the something used here to discuss nothing is merely meta-nothing, and cannot be formally defined within a system that contains nothing.
Therefore 1+1=2 and thus 1-1=0, QED,
Buffy
