Go Back   Science Forums
View Single Post
Old 05-29-2007   #200 (permalink)
Qfwfq's Avatar
Qfwfq
Exhausted Gondolier


Location:
Floating On An Ocean Of Hydrogen
 
Qfwfq has a reputation beyond reputeQfwfq has a reputation beyond reputeQfwfq has a reputation beyond reputeQfwfq has a reputation beyond reputeQfwfq has a reputation beyond reputeQfwfq has a reputation beyond reputeQfwfq has a reputation beyond reputeQfwfq has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Defining the nature of rational discussion!

Quote:
Originally Posted by questor View Post
do you think that a premise that can't be explained and understood in a few sentences will change your life?
Have General Relativity and Cosmology changed your life? Or the Standard Model of particle physics?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctordick View Post
Now that is an out and out joke! If your mind is so limited that you can come up with no better reason for not listening to logic than that, I sincerely pity you. By the way, as an aside, I believe that is called an “ad hominem argument”; something I thought this forum discuraged.
Now perhaps that could be called tit for tat, or perhaps his wasn't even ad hominem because it wasn't an attempt to refute your position but instead mainly just criticism of your efforts to comunicate it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ldsoftwaresteve View Post
Hmm. I think DoctorDick has something important that he's trying to get across. We can have all kinds of rhetoric to the contrary but it won't change my mind.
I think his problem is at the very least one of being unable to get it across. I'm still not sure whether or not what he's trying to get across actually is worthy. It could be interesting if it were. Partly it seems to be a generalization of what I already saw in my theoretical physics course, i. e. arriving at the Dirac equation from general symmetry considerations, but his claim is to do something more extended than this which would be interesting, and I still don't know how his definitions lead to his fundamental equation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ldsoftwaresteve View Post
And that strikes at the term, 'rational'. If our perception is faulty, how rational are we?
I disagree, rational doesn't necessarily mean faithfully representing reality. One can be highly rational about totally hypothetical or imaginary things.


----------------
Inutil insegnà al mus, si piart timp, in plui si infastidìs la bestie.

Hypography Forum PITA...... er, Administrator.
Reply With Quote
 
» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:52 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network