Go Back   Science Forums
View Single Post
Old 06-04-2007   #14 (permalink)
CraigD's Avatar
CraigD
Creating


Location:
Silver Spring, MD, USA
 
CraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Post "Reformed" fuel, pyrolysis, and scaling up issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by freeztar View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigD View Post
AFAIK, hydrogen, CH4 (methane), and other “reformed” fuel gases are made from more massive hydrocarbon molecule fuels, and have no more energy than these source fuels.
What do you mean by this? H2 and CH4 are produced naturally through the pyrolysis. I guess the "reformed" part is throwing me off.
Hydrogen reforming refers specifically to the process of extracting hydrogen (and, as a by-product, CO) from methane (CH4) by adding water and heat – it’s thus commonly termed “steam reforming”, and is how most hydrogen gas is currently produced. I was generalizing the term a bit – perhaps inappropriately – to refer to any process that creates one fuel from another.

In this more general sense, pyrolysis – the simplest form of which I’m aware consists of simply capping a large mass of organic waste and using the resulting methane at the pressure the system produces – is a reforming process. Like many practical fuel reforming schemes, the added energy – heat - needed for the reaction is supplied by the source fuel itself. A famous, small-scale system of this kind was one promoted by the PRC government for rural use, in which the waste manure from a single household produced cooking and lighting gas for the house.

Burning the methane produced by this, or any pyrolysis system, produces less energy than burning the feed fuel (manure, etc.), but is much cleaner burning, and easier to deliver to burners, lamp mantles, fuel cells, etc.

Fuel from biomass seems a very good solution for situations where large biomasses are available and there’s a need for gas fuel, but gas fuels aren’t ideal for all applications. In particular, they’re not ideal for vehicles. And, as with other renewable fuel schemes, I’m unsure if sufficient biomass exists, and whether facilities to gasify it can feasibly be made, to 100% replace the power needs currently satisfied by fossil fuels.


----------------
Moderator: Computers and Technology; Medical Science; Science Projects and Homework; Philosophy of Science; Physics and Mathematics; Environmental Studies
Reply With Quote
 
» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 30.00%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 40.00%
4 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 30.00%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 10
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:29 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network