Science Forums 2

[coldcreation]

Is this the place to discuss the QSSC model (after all this is an alternative theory), or should that be in the cosmology section (after all it is a cosmology).

What about Segal's Chronometric Cosmology, or Arps discordant redshifts (after all, these too are alternative models.)

Come to think of it Linde's multiverse hypothesis is an alternative theory. It is not mainstream by any stretch of the imagination.

Should all theories that have an intrinsic break-down of the fundamental laws of physics somewhere or at some time t inherent in the model be discussed in this new sub-section?

Is only the big bang to be discussed in the other section called Astronomy and Cosmology, subtitled From the Big Bang to Multiverse...and everything inbetween.

If indeed that is where to discuss the multiverse idea, I am confused. That is not by a longshot a mainstream view.

So what gives?

CC