Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctordick
The arbitrary labels are “arbitrary labels” and the mapping may be chosen anyway at all. Essentially, nothing is consequential; the consequences are entirely in your epistemological construct (your interpretation of what is going on). It makes utterly no difference what that epistemological construct is, if it is internally consistent, the temporal behavior of the ontological elements can be interpreted such that my equation is a valid constraint.
|
Well, I suppose I didn't word my post very well and you misunderstood it.
i should have said
which are the arbitrary labels, not
what. In the spy's case there are some non-arbitrary numbers and I don't see what the arbitrary labels would be. I don't see what you would map those numbers on to and I don't know what the table would be. I'm therefore unable to deduce the validity of your constraints.
----------------
Inutil insegnŕ al mus, si piart timp, in plui si infastiděs la bestie.
Hypography Forum PITA...... er, Administrator.
