Science Forums 2

[HydrogenBond]

A left sided thinker is better able to perform the rational requirements of business and organization. The left thinker has the skills needed for interfacing ideas with the reality of the situation, but may make lack fresh creative ideas. If nothing needs to change, this is ideal. If we need alot of change, he will have to rely on advisors to be his right brain.

The creative mind or right brain may have their heads in the clouds fishing out new ideas. They may have good ideas, but they may not be able function in an affective way to connect their ideas to the reality of a large partisan organization. The right side thinker would have the ideas, but would need to recruit go-to or left side people who can interface the system more effectively for him.

The left brain leader, with his group of right side advisors, may not have the time to reason all these ideas through. His strength is putting the ball in play and moving it down the field. He is ready to move and needs the ideas to move as fast as he is able to go or else he is unhappy. He is sort of the quarterback and needs the coaches to send in plays. He is taking hits and gaining yards and wants to keep the ball moving.

The right brain leader has all the ideas but needs others to drive them through the system for him. He is more the coach than the quarterback. It is easier for him see the entire field and the strategy of the other team. He is buffered from the field abuse, by having good field generals.

The left brain person is more like the quarterback in the field. He gets more glory, than the coach, since he is the one in the game. But he is also going to take hits, will fumble or throw intersceptions at times. He doesn't really have other field generals, but only a staff of coaches. Even if they all agree, a couple of rocky hits can make it hard at times to implement the ideas of the coaching staff, who can't give him rest, since they do no really have a backup quarterback.

The right side thinker, is safe on the sidelines, like a coach. If his star is hurt, he can send in another replacement to give him rest. This way the attack is never stopped, so the other team gets tired. He can also double team or even flood a zone with a battle grouping of quarterbacks.

The election process would never elect a right thinker. One has to be the left side quarterback, with a group of right side coaches. A right side thinker would be ineffective in this process. All he has are ideas, but not the left side push to drive others to see all his ideas. The process goes to the left side, but the job is better suited to the right side.

Many people don't like Bush and Chaney. Chaney is a different type of vice president. He is more like a field general who gives and takes heat for the president. He is not the more traditional side-line coaching staff for the star quarterback. If a president he had a half dozen Chaney caliber field generals, and they were on a tight leash, things would happen. We may never see that since the process is designed to be a quarterback try-out. A coach may know all the plays, and try out, but after a few tackles, he's is toast. He would need to bring his captains with him to protect the coach when he is in the pocket ready to make his pass.

In my opinion the best quarterback out there is Mitt Romney. He is a republican govenor in a very liberal state but can build consensus. He would have to surround himself with good right side thinkers. Hilary appears to have a a better natural balance between right and left. She is sort of blend of a quarterback and coach, which is like more a back-up quarterback. She does have her husband ex-president Clinon who was an excellent quarterback who could be placed on her staff.