Quote:
Originally Posted by jedaisoul
Which begs the question: Have you questioned the reports you quote? What evidence do they have to support their view? Do they "have an axe to grind"? What is their background? What have civics and history been replaced by in the curriculum? Is it more or less "rote learning"?
There's always another side to an argument. What is it? What evidence do the proponents of that argument have to support their view?
There are people who make a living out of "knocking the status quo", in whatever field they chose. Just because something is in print, that doesn't make it authoritative, or true.
|
You make a very good point. I shall have to drop Wolf an email.
