Reading through this paper I find the following statement:
Quote:
|
The laws generating all chemical, biological, neurological processes are now perfectly known. Never before in history, science has been able to explain the principles by which all biological processes are originated. This represents a true turn in history. All that physics will discover in the future will have nothing to do with the biological processes in our organism, or any other organism.
|
Then you say:
Quote:
|
The theory of evolution is based on the recovery of fossils, and it can be applied only to biological organisms. We do not have sufficient elements to establish whether the human biological organism is the result of an evolution process; neither we have sufficient elements to exclude this possibility.
|
How can we have 100% proof of biological processes if we (according to you) don't know whether human beings are the result of evolution or not?
