Science Forums 2

[InfiniteNow]

He is using denialist tactics. I did not freshly mint it AND I supplied a link.
He is making broad accuasations with no detail. He is not specific in his claims of inaccuracy.
He also is arguing against the entire process of peer review, and this is a crackpot method of supporting one's own approach.

Pmaust - I've read the response you received. I've answered your questions openly AND specifically. I've given citation, and explanation of every point I've made, and in supporting my assertions never attacked his character (although, I admittedly did this on first read due to my extreme disgust, but it was never in support of my own position).

His response has offered nothing new.
His response did not counter anything I shared with specific examples. It simply painted with the broad brush of someone who is attempting to sew the seeds of doubt.


You can appraoch this however you want. Believe whatever you want. I'm not going to keep fighting you with the truth. Go find it for yourself, and stop listening to what other people tell you.


In short, his response to you does not warrant further evidence be offered by me. He has done nothing further to support his claims or counter mine. All he's done is try to spin the issue in such a way that you might perchance believe him if you're not paying close enough attention.

Go find your own truth. I will address specific questions, but not this non-specific and unsupported attack on the entire domain of scientific literature and research which he's focussed on the IPCC and global climate change research as a whole.