Quote:
Originally Posted by freeztar
I'll give you "promoting a riot", but I still don't understand why you are claiming "conspiracy to contribute to global warming"? There's no conspiracy about it, it's guilty.
|
It's conspiracy because it is only one contributor of many. I note you didn't care to discount any of the other contributors I indicted. A good choice because doing that is a logical fallacy; spitting in the wind so to speak. I do hope you read up on all you can find about heating in the oceans from volcanism and hydrothermal venting. If in fact as I say this is where a
lot of the heat is coming from, and not the greenhouse effect, then spending money to reduce CO2 on that premise is a waste. The fact that the effects of these features is largely unknown, is exactly why the current 'best' model is inherently flawed by virtue of bias. Quite simply the argument/consensus goes that 'we are not bothered by any facts we don't use.'.
Do read the meteroic dust post above I put up while you were replying. Yet another indictment. Best model yet notwithstanding, to quote Winston quoting Korzybski, the map is NOT the territory.
