|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Should cities be inside-out to reduce pollution?
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmarinas86
A: Distance from center
B: Area at this distance
C: Inside-out's population density at this distance
D: Outside-in's population density at this distance
E: Inside-out's population at this distance
F: Outside in's total population
Code:
A B C D E F
0 0 0 10 0 0
1 1 1 9 1 9
2 3 2 8 6 24
3 6 3 7 18 42
4 10 4 6 40 60
5 15 5 5 75 75
6 21 6 4 126 84
7 28 7 3 196 84
8 36 8 2 288 72
9 45 9 1 405 45
10 55 10 0 550 0
INSIDE-OUT'S TOTAL POPULATION: 1705
OUTSIDE-IN'S TOTAL POPULATION: 495
Assuming that traffic is proportional to population density along the line, I would assume that the traffic delay inside "inside-out" city is not three times as bad.
|
While I give applause for the code block, I'm wondering how you came to 1705/495 for "inside-out"/"outside-in" respectively? For one thing, F-10 shows a value of "0"?
I'd be interested in knowing the difference in water surface area between the two. 
----------------
Hypography Science Forums Moderator
---
"There are no passengers on Spaceship Earth. We are all crew." - Marshall McLuhan
"We must not forget that when radium was discovered no one knew that it would prove useful in hospitals. The work was one of pure science. And this is a proof that scientific work must not be considered from the point of view of the direct usefulness of it." - Marie Curie
|