Quote:
Originally Posted by InfiniteNow
Thanks for the reply, but you basically just walked around my request.
Also, life has been created in the lab, so the whole abiogenesis angle isn't really working for me anyway. Further, most of Behe's assertions have been debunked. Ken Miller did this quite well, but so have others.
|
Again, articulating a credible opposing argument is not a refutation. It is an opposing argument. I am not sure why a credible opposing argument is so broadly accepted as a "refutation" on this forum. If someone were to prove that Behe's argument is either 1) not possible (as opposed to arguing that complex structures might have been generated by serial mutation), or 2) at odds with fact, it would be refuted. To my knowledge, no one has done that. A number of competent folks have offered credible defenses of the standard dogma.
I have not watched the program. I will look at it.
Bio
----------------
Few problems are so complex that they cannot be substantially clarified by one more cup of coffee
(or a nice cabernet if it is after 5:00)
Moderator in absentia. Return anticipated. Timing somewhat vague.
