|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Science is close-minded
Quote:
Originally Posted by Overdog
I disagree with you.
Suppose I assert that Hydrogen does NOT exist, then you can show me some Hydrogen, then my assertion that it does NOT exist has been demontrated to be false, has it not?
Perhaps you misunderstand my earlier post. I'm saying that it is not scientific to postulate that God Exists, that the scientific approach would be that God does NOT exist, until such time as the evidence shows otherwise.
|
Ok, yes I believe I did misunderstand what you were originally getting at. I definitely agree with what you are stating here.
And as such, I assume you would therefore agree with the second part of my post where I said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by REASON
Concurrently, it should be understood that just because one cannot prove that something does not exist, it is a fallacy to therefore conclude that it does exist.
|
----------------
It seems to me that people tend to prefer to believe what they want to be real or true, despite evidence to the contrary.
When what you believe is refuted by evidence, you are faced with a choice.
|