Go Back   Science Forums
View Single Post
Old 06-13-2008   #9 (permalink)
CraigD's Avatar
CraigD
Creating


Location:
Silver Spring, MD, USA
 
CraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Post Bright and super are noun, not adjectives

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moontanman View Post
I'm bright and shiny
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbird View Post
I guess I'm not to bright.
Looks like there’s a need to trot out some basic bright principles, as, in a manner typical of the movement, we seem to be violating them from the get-go!

Bright in this context must be used as a noun, not an adjective. I am a bright (or, if I chose to explicitly identify myself with the website-supported movement, a Bright, with a capital B). I do not profess to be a bright person, as in smarter than the average person.

A person with tested intelligence so low as to be considered legally handicapped can be a bright, while a person with genius-level tested intelligence can be a super.

Being a bright means I have a world view devoid of the supernatural – in everyday terms, I don’t believe in God, gods, ghosts, etc. If I were to encounter a god or a ghost, this world view would lead me to attempt to explain it in natural terms – for example, as a psychological effect, such as a dream or hallucination, or a natural phenomenon external to my body.

Someone who is not a bright is a super. Being a super means that one has a world view including the supernatural – he believes in God, gods, and/or ghosts, etc. Belief in the supernatural implies the belief that some experiences or phenomena cannot be explained in natural terms – for example, miracles which are caused by an entity able to affect, but not be affected, by the physical universe.

As the current 20% in the poll indicates, some people reject the bright/super classification scheme, accepting neither noun as applicable to them, or objecting to the making of such a distinction.

Approached very analytically, who is and who is not a bright can be a very difficult question. For example, one can argue that a person who believe in the Genesis creation account literally, but feels that science will eventually reveal the truth of it, might be considered a bright, while someone who believes that quantum uncertainty makes certain data unknowable might be considered a super. However, kept on an intuitive level, to borrow the form of a famous quote, I can’t tell you exactly what a bright or a super is, but I know one if I see (well, actually, have an honest conversation with) one.


----------------
Moderator: Computers and Technology; Medical Science; Science Projects and Homework; Philosophy of Science; Physics and Mathematics; Environmental Studies
Reply With Quote
 
» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 30.00%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 40.00%
4 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 30.00%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 10
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:39 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network