Science Forums 2

[LJP07]

I suppose the primary reason I'm looking deeper into the issue is because Theists always come back to the argument "How can something come from nothing?"...I hate this question because I don't have a good argument, I'm not up on the Big Ban and most current theories i.e I'm a Chemist not a Physicist.

Anyway, back to the issue at hand, I understand our brain is coded and functioned in that we always look and see a "Beginning" and an "End"...I believe when applied to physics, this has to be overlooked...and it's quite simple to see why!!

Obviously there is NO God. Therefore if there was NOTHING...(and I mean no annihilation particles or any other form of energy or particle) then nothing could be formed from this, so obviously there was something, it just makes sense. Connecting this point from the Universe is the big question as far as I'm concerned, I don't view a "Beginning" or an "End"...rather the full story should be sought and not just what's happened in our universe, however I understand we can only work with what were given. But what if you could work backwards from the singularity...a gradual build-up of this energy upto a limit where it has no alternative choice but to expand out...for example, like feeding small amounts of heat into a system, when it goes beyond stability it goes Kaboom!...

Although these are incredibly small things to think about...I know I'm going out on a limb saying all this...probably wrong again...but better than accepting nothing. If you had an INFINITE Space where particles existed...maybe ones not known to physics and probably never will be known...and this was like a Particle Playground...high temps...fast moving particles... etc and forces that held multiple colliding particles together, if this happened over time, an incredibly dense and incredibly hot object like the singularity would be created which could expand on itself and form the "Big Bang"...

But flatter me with the physics of how I could be wrong?