|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Real Life Star Destroyer
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reaper
Except that the architects of the stardestroyer have had Galactic Civilization for much, much longer then we have had agriculture. Stardestroyers are capable of going millions of times faster than the speed of light. The source of their power for propulsion is unknown. .
|
This is a similar, yet more feasible Intergalactic Space Craft, that can carry 40 Orion's, and is explained fully.
Now when they do make the jump to C, everyone inside is turned into shapeless paste, thats the only draw back, and I don't think there is a reasonable solution yet.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Reaper
Given these timescales, their huge size (about 1.6 km) and their preposterous energy requirements, and the social cooperation and industrial capability necessary to build one, I doubt we would be able to build one in 500 years, or a 1000 years.
|
I disagree. Look at some of the things we have done in the past with what we had then, and look out how much we have now, and how little we are doing. Here are some of the tools that would aid the Star Ship giant, such as this,
Hypography - Science for everyone
We are making discoveries all of the time, we are advancing faster than ever, and in 500 years, sheesh, this is a merciful undertaking.
----------------
"We believed the world would not be the same, a few people laughed, a few people cried, most people were silent, I remembered a line from the Hindu scripture, the bagavagita, Vishnu was trying to convince the prince that he should do his duty, and to impress him, he takes on his multi-armed form and says, Now I have become death, destroyer of worlds. I suppose we all thought that, in one way or another"
-Robert J Oppenheimer, The atomic bomb
Last edited by Gardamorg; 07-02-2008 at 05:33 PM..
|
