I agree with you completely.
I don't feel carbon credits really 'count'. I also don't like seeing 'green' used without some serious backup.
I must apologize as I aparently got the wrong impression. I thought that you were being critical of any company that used the term 'green' regardless of what they did to back that up because essentially anything produced does 'some' damage.
I see from you last post I was wrong, thank you for the clarification
