Quote:
Originally Posted by Buffy
Um. In Logic 101 we learn that proofs based on Tautologies are invalid by definition. Since your entire post bases its logic on the initial set of Tautologies you present, it has no validity.
|
Proofs based on absolute truth are invalid by definition? LOL
Why that is rather interesting!
Logical tautology is Logical truth; A statement which is necessarily true because, by virtue of its logical form, it cannot be used to make a false assertion.
It is IMPOSSIBLE to create a proof without using tautologies whether you found it on ad hoc axioms or not. A tautology is a THEOREM in propositional calculus!
You should consider asking for your money back if you paid tuition... because you obviously didn't learn the basics and according to you... you were taught gross falsehoods.
