Quote:
Originally Posted by Buffy
Um. In Logic 101 we learn that proofs based on Tautologies are invalid by definition. Since your entire post bases its logic on the initial set of Tautologies you present, it has no validity.
I'd encourage you again to read our rules. If your primary purpose here is to "prove the existence of God" then you may find yourself unwelcome.
To reiterate, the purpose of our prohibition of Proselytizing is that it is offensive not because we wish to stifle expressions of religious faith, but because it is forcing personal beliefs on others. We no more tolerate forcing atheists to "accept God" than we tolerate trying to argue the superiority of one religious belief over another.
I never told my religion nor scrutinize that of another. I never attempted to make a convert nor wished to change another's creed. I have judged of others' religion by their lives, for it is from our lives and not from our words that our religion must be read. By the same test must the world judge me, 
Buffy |
Talk about being biased and standing a firm stand against freedom of speech. Why is there a theology thread if no one can argue God exist? Why bate people with this forum and with questions? What is the purpose of this forum if no one is allowed to say God exist?
