Quote:
Originally Posted by questor
If the you-tube repesentation of abiogenisis is correct and we know how to generate life, WHY don't we do it?
|
We do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by questor
The text article pointed to 3 possibilties for abiogenisis--which is correct? If we know, why can't we do it? You ask for proof for other ideas, do you accept these theories blindly?
|
Nope. See below. I think it will become plainly obvious how misinformed/uninformed you truly are on this:
Here's a good overview:
Primordial Soup's On: Scientists Repeat Evolution's Most Famous Experiment: Scientific American
Also, this is a must for anyone truly interested:
The Harbinger. My Scientific Discussions of Evolution for the Pope and His Scientists
You can also make life in your own kitchen.
Call Sigma Chemical Co. at 800-325-3010 and order 1 bottle of catalog number M 7145 and one bottle of R 7131 amino acids solutions (you need both to get all the amino acids
http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/sigma/fo...n/M5550for.pdf). They will cost you about $40 plus shipping for both. Empty the bottles into a fying pan, turn the heat on low and heat until all the water is evaporated. Then heat for 15-60 minutes. Add water. You will have protocells in the solution.
Here is more on one type of protocell:
SpringerLink - Journal Article
As per irreducible complexity, that is supposed to be a falsification of natural selection according to ID, but it has been shown that Behe used a strawman version of natural selection and that natural selection can produce any complex biological structure
A classification of possible routes of Darwinian evolution.
New Way To Think About Earth's First Cells
Quote:
A team of researchers at Harvard University have modeled in the laboratory a primitive cell, or protocell, that is capable of building, copying and containing DNA.
Since there are no physical records of what the first primitive cells on Earth looked like, or how they grew and divided, the research team's protocell project offers a useful way to learn about how Earth's earliest cells may have interacted with their environment approximately 3.5 billion years ago.
|
And, just in case you're too lazy to read all of the above, or you feel the need to attack someone for relying on YouTube, here's more fodder for your falsehoods.
Quote:
Originally Posted by questor
I guess the truth is, that by happenstance, all the building blocks of life just happened to be lying around near each other, and they just happened to join up together in such a way as to create life in its millions of forms.
|
As much as it pains me to tell you this, questor, your version of the truth is not really an accurate one, as should be abundantly clear by now if you were truly paying attention to the information which has been shared.
