Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbird
The simple fact here is Inow is referring to articles that he claims show that we can create life, when the scientist that are doing experiments are not claiming that.
Life is a process that is more than the sum of its parts. yes we can fuse parts and we can even do experiments that recreate certain process, but we do not know all the steps of first origins of how the process started. We are at work at it but nothing yet has been created that is called life.
|
I'm not really arguing against your point.
But do you believe that despite our ability to generate "life" in a laboratory, we have accumulated enough evidence to support the theory of Abiogenesis, or something along those lines? Essentially, would you agree that there is enough evidence to support the idea that life has come about naturally on this planet?
