Quote:
Originally Posted by modest
Uh... are you sure you read what I wrote?
Real change requires real movement. Nothing can change without moving. No example can be given otherwise.
Real movement requires real time. Nothing can move without time. No example can be given otherwise.
~modest
PS - change is not a basic physics concept. Change is how humans think of movement. The more fundamental of the two is movement. More fundamental than movement is space and time.
Time, Distance, and Mass are the fundamental units of physics.
|
I think I did. But did you understand my question was "How can you Know"?
Ok, let me try to explain what I and some others are saying.
Lets take Plato's definition of Knowledge as Justified, True, Belief.
Epistemology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You've got the
Belief part, and you've given excellent
Justification. All that now stands in the way of an assertion that time has objective reality is the
True part.
And this is where we run into a problem, because whatever time is, we can't observe it under a microscope. And the excerpt I posted from the Stanford Philosophy of Science site says knowledge of unobserved phenomenon is impossible.
How can we get around this? How can we
Know time has objective reality?
EDIT:
Or did I misconstrue/misunderstand what you were saying?
