Quote:
Originally Posted by coldcreation
Gentlemen,
I think what Pluto is trying to say (despite the possibility that his numbers might be off) is that there appears to be too little time in a big bang universe (one that is ~13.7 Gyr old) for the formation of particular galaxies and the large-scale structures of which they form part.
|
No CC. I appreciate what you're doing for Pluto, but we've already been over this. I've tried twice in the past to point him in the same direction as you're saying. In
this post I come right out and say it:
Quote:
Originally Posted by modest
If your objection to standard cosmology is that 500 million years is not enough time for a mature galaxy to evolve and you have evidence of mature galaxies that are 13.2 GYr light-travel-time then that is a better objection than you were saying before.
My concern was correcting your statement that the number of galaxies in the hubble deep field was a problem for BBT.
|
Which he has since confirmed, it is the
number of galaxies that he's objecting to. Not the quality, metallicity, size, maturity, ect of such galaxies.
So I appreciate what you're doing - I tried to give pluto the same out, but he has stated his claim quite clearly almost a dozen times.
~modest
