Moderation note: These posts originally appeared in the User Feedback thread "really frustrated". They were moved to the Theology forum, because they began addressing questions concerning the idea of God, rather than complaints and complements about hypography and/or its administration.
I can appreciate the necessity to carefully word everything, because this is a science forum. However, I am a bit confused about why it is wrong to saying God is the stuff of the universe and organizing forces, without saying this a point of view or a possibility every time, and it is not wrong to say, God doesn't exist- as a matter of fact?
I thought Preaching/Proselytizing meant something more that saying we can think of God as the stuff of universe and organizing forces?
I am also curious about the coincidence of getting two penalties soon after someone was told to stop insulting me. I think pointing out that some scientist are agreeable to accepting the existence of God, should have prevented the second penalty given because I didn't meet a requirement of proving some scientist are thinking along the same lines as I am. I have not been aware the rule that says if you can not prove what you are saying you can be penalized, and there does seem to be a double standard, that men of science have pointed out. It is not proven a God does not exist, and yet mods don't seem to demanding prove from these God doesn't exist folks. I don't think they are penalized for possibly offending someone when they state God exist as a matter of fact?
