DD:
Quote:
|
My definition of time stands! The past is "what we know" and the future is "what we do not know". The present then becomes the boundry (of our knowledge).
|
This is the only definition of time that makes any sense if one's worldview says time has no ontological reality. Everyone who thinks otherwise will fight it tooth and nail.
I don't see how both views can be wrong since a thing cannot both be and not be at the same time, so, at least one view is correct and since they contradict each other .... only one will be correct.
What would the definition of time be from the other perspective?
