Quote:
Originally Posted by modest
Yet there is something (some concept) that distinguishes two past events that are exactly the same in every way except for 'time' that separates them.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctordick
This is a consequence of your interpretation of these events. You are the one who has decided that these two past events are exactly the same. Have you considered the possibility that you are wrong?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by modest
However, what in your definition distinguishes the three past rotations from each other?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctordick
What you miss is that my fundamental equation is a many body equation including every entity in the universe.
|
Honestly! Look at that exchange. You knew just what I was asking for - why is your answer twice ambiguous?
This post is where I found the answer you could have quickly given had you intended some basic explanation of your system rather than quick and unproductive responses that insult my intelligence:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctordick
The next step I take is to transform the numerical representation into points on the x axis. This step however introduces a difficult fundamental problem as information can be lost if multiple occurrences of a given number exist in the elements of B(t). That is the reason I introduce the tau axis. Without the tau axis, there is no way of using points to represent all possibilities with points.
|
So, I assume you have some t axis which is built on some four dimensional geometry. How then is your tau different from normal proper time? Or, is that probably too complicated to get into? Maybe I should just go admire your theory rather than asking questions which continue to demonstrate my inability to comprehend
~modest
