Science Forums 2

[7DSUSYstrings]

I agree slightly, time machines can not physically possibly go backwards. Time is only a conception and not a physical existence, it is a virtual based measure of counting.

This is what my work is ultimately about.

Like most scientists I believe in something for a reason. In this case, call it a "hunch," but for any form of paranormal activity, such as a premonition, to occur, an image composed of a photon matrix had to be able to travel backwards in time. For that to happen, the future must already be there, developed around what we do in our current present that in turn was developed around what happened in our past. This means time does exist as more than an artificial means to do bookkeeping. It means absolute time exists in the form of frames. The frames must be connected by something just as the frames of a movie are connected by the clear celluloid film. A time machine must be able to vibrate at the frequency of the "celluloid" or what most who believe in it call flux.

Yes, I do have a number of concepts for creating such a device. It takes a lot of work to determine the right geometry, field structures and such. Build the wrong device and hop in, give it a whirl and it could be your last... anything.

Alexander,

Regarding the math, I'm waiting for some guide on the HTML structure as stated previously. I'd rather not do a botched up job of it and appear assinine, or as an eqinian glute. Other than that, I'm very busy for most of this month. Remember my response to "Jackson" in the intro thread about getting my house back? That will consume much of my time, but when I get a chance I'll do some serious refinement.

From what I can see you are doing rather well in running the numbers yourself. Remember also, there's still some question concerning the possibility of a naked singularity. I tend to agree with Penrose that a singularity must be contained within some mass, regardless of how rapidly it approaches zero.

A vacuum leak would very likely be detected and the collider would automatically shut down. This is one area that this thread is properly an engineering question. Nuclear reactors, as an example, are built with what are called "scram" mechanisms. These drop key control rods into place to stop the progress of neutrons in a few seconds. If the scram fails, the reactor could blow up and breach the containment building. Sudbury England had a bad containment breach like this in the early 70's. There were others as we learned that nuclear powerplants need be build with utmost care and many had not been so.

Catch you folks tomorrow or Monday...

Dr. C.