Science Forums 2

[alexander]

that does not make any sense to me either, if a civilization exists, there must be archeological proof of it's existance, homes, tools, bones, something, but there are certainly none of that found yet for this "advanced civilization theory", problem is, there are no tools remaining from the cutting of the hard rock, anyways. No tools, no techniques, no references in the scriptures or even folklore... like they were never even processed or cut, and they, as far as the pictures show, were cut, not flint-napped, or chiseled, the edges are too perfect, sometimes even rather sharp, and the way the lid fits on the sarcophagus too, light does not penetrate that seal... and the fact that they exist proves that the stones were processed, thus cut, and technology for cutting stone has not existed for a very long time at all, polished, but if you are thinking sand and water, sand is softer then grey granite, fitted, and as i described, perfectly fitted at that, and installed, unless all the giant statues in egyptian cities were cut out of rock that does not even appear in the local region geologically, someone had to move a 1000ton rock, with smooth polished surfaces and delicate details, thing that we still can't do with today's tools...

I'll give an example of moving a big rock. In order to deliver the base for a monument to Marshall Zhukov, weighing approximately 100 ton (in Moscow), required the help of a dozen of tanks...