Go Back   Science Forums
View Single Post
Old 09-29-2008   #7 (permalink)
Moontanman's Avatar
Moontanman
Astounding Vision


Location:
South Eastern North Carolina, Cape Fear Region
 
Moontanman has a reputation beyond reputeMoontanman has a reputation beyond reputeMoontanman has a reputation beyond reputeMoontanman has a reputation beyond reputeMoontanman has a reputation beyond reputeMoontanman has a reputation beyond reputeMoontanman has a reputation beyond reputeMoontanman has a reputation beyond reputeMoontanman has a reputation beyond reputeMoontanman has a reputation beyond reputeMoontanman has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Moontanman
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Super light-weight Space-Crafts of the future!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gardamorg View Post
Nano Assembly would allow the spacecraft to be both strong and light.

With light fuel, and a light haul/craft, the craft will zip through space, as opposed to a craft with light fuel and a heavy craft producing drag.

We wouldn't need it to be any stronger than high class titanium or diamond.
First of all what do you hope to achieve by making the space craft super light? Read this link, all of it.....

BRUCE BEHRHORST ARTICLE LIST

Once you get to a certain point lowering the weight just increases the risk of failure. When the space craft is already much lighter than the fuel, engine, and payload, to go even lighter just makes it weaker with no real increase of speed or acceleration.

In space you have no drag dude, mass simply resists acceleration but the gain of a couple of percent in acceleration isn't worth the risk of failure. Hydrogen is already as light as reaction mass is going to get, the Saturn five rocket was very light in comparison to it's fuel and payload weight but it was also on the ragged edge of failure. A reusable space craft needs to be more durable than that. The Saturn five was much lighter than it should have been to make up for the small Isp of it's engines. It would be very difficult to make a space craft any lighter. It's fuel tanks weren't much more than metal balloons as it was.

You seem to have a strange idea of what strong is, diamond is not strong, it's hard, there is a difference. I can smash diamonds quite easily, titanium is strong but it will bend and deform.


----------------
Michael
Life is the poetry of the universe.
Love is the poetry of life.

Nuclear is the only real option!
http://www.nuclearspace.com/Liberty_ship_menupg.aspx

Over heard from a three year old, "Daddy why do my toes get sticky when I eat strawberry jam?"

Never wrestle a troll. You both get dirty and the troll likes it

Proud graduate of Wossamotta University!
Reply With Quote
 
» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:24 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network