Go Back   Science Forums
View Single Post
Old 10-03-2008   #49 (permalink)
HydrogenBond's Avatar
HydrogenBond
Creating


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Is It Possible To Remake Creationism Into A Scientific Theory?

One way to look at religion and gods is that what is worshiped is not typically material or biological and does not fit into the casual or even the probabilistic laws of science. For example, an angel is neither physical or biological and can defy the laws of science as we know it both in terms of cause and affect and probability. I am not saying this is true or not, just this is how it is defined.

What that says, creationism is it is not talking about biology or science, since it does not follow these laws. The one phenomena in nature that conceptually works under the same lack of physical constraints, is the human imagination. In our imagination, we can go back into time (pretend) and then even make a movie to show how dinosaurs behaved. This is not real because it would involve time travel. But the movie will use science personifications, blended with imagination to create a semi-reality. In the imagination cause and effect , realty or probability don't need to be active. In my imagination, I defy all the odds and win the lottery at will, even while I am on stage performing rock music to a bunch of naked women. This is totally impossible in reality but is possible with the imagination.

The symbolism in the bible that defy biology and physical science comes from the imagination. But it was not made up by the will, but was a natural expression of the brain, using the imagination, sort of like awake dreams. The inner self, which used to be the center of animal instinct, was defining itself in terms of the human mind. For example, spontaneous fantasy of an inflated ego state, like being a rock star, can sometimes be unconscious compensation for something. What was projected in these symbols indirectly tells you what was going at that time.
Reply With Quote
 
» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:48 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network