Go Back   Science Forums
View Single Post
Old 10-05-2008   #1 (permalink)
bochen2's Avatar
bochen2
Thinking


 
bochen2 is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Does a most perfect girl/woman exists?

Maybe perhaps there is a oneness that explains and contains the three ‘worlds’- the Platonic mathematical,the physical, and the mental. Maybe there is a fundamental experience that makes no distinction or differentiation between the physical, mental, and mathematical?

It is important to define just what is meant by "existence". As Penrose pointed out in his Road to Reality, the Mandelbrot set is an infinitely complexed set (infinitely more complexed and detailed than the know universe itself) therefore it does not "exists" in the physical universe as we know it (nor do circles, triangles, etc..) nor does it exists in its entirety in our minds (at most only a tiny shadow of a point of a rough approximation) but yet it does have its own existential abstract platonic mathematical existence that cannot be denied. Would the Mandelbrot set still be said to exists if there was no physical universe and no carbon based life to be aware of its existence?

So my question is Does a most perfect girl/woman exists? And in which domain of existence? Hypothetically and theoretically there can and should be a most perfect (physically beautiful and elegantly graceful) girl/lady/woman (female homo sapien) at least in the abstract platonic existential plane and domain (a supremum across all "existences" if you will)

Right now if we had the ability to analyze every living human female we would come up with a supremum in regards to beauty. One single individual female that looks better than all the rest of the earth. The point I am making is even if we did NOT have the ability to categorize, prioritize, define, quantify, qualify, etc every single woman in terms of beauty and do an absolute ranking the "supremum" always does exists! Even if we never had the Olympics Games Ussain Bolt is still the fastest man alive at 100m and 200m in 19.20 seconds REGARDLESS of us measuring and witnessing the event. If we lived in the stone age with no technology whatsoever he would STILL be the fastest man alive.... etc... The most beautiful girl/woman alive on earth right now (by definition of supremum) MUST and DOES exists. I just think the beauty pageants never turn out anyone really beautiful... Miss Universe is NOT from honest scientific point of view anywhere NEAR the true most beautiful girl/woman on earth.

But more interesting the question is does such a perfect girl/woman exists in physical form somewhere OUT THERE in the "real world" as a breathing living flesh and blood human being? Basically do we have a hit/match and a convergence between what is the existential supremum of physical beauty with what is actual-physical possible and already existing in the physical world.

This is NOT the same as asking if we can ever find a physical object that was exactly circular of if the Mandelbrot set exists in the physical universe (we know mathematically that is impossible!!) I am simply asking if the existential supremum and the physical supremum are ONE and the same person? IE.. IS the most beautiful girl/woman alive right now on Earth (whoever and wherever and whenever she is) look exactly the same (indistinguishable from; in terms of physical beauty and perfection) as "THE most beautiful girl/woman ever possible existentially or otherwise?"

Basically if it could be proven that the absolute human limit for running the 200m sprint is 18.00seconds then we have not a man who is the "fastest runner POSSIBLE" because Bolt was 1.30 seconds slower... So the physical supremum (BOLT in this case) is not the same "person" as the existential supremum (a hypothetical 18.00sec runner that has yet to materialized in physical form ). But one day if someone does run a 18.00 then on that glorious day the existential supremum and the physical supremum would be one and the same exact PERSON! A perfection of sorts would have been achieved.

So in that light, I guess my question is : We know the physical supremum most beautiful woman exists right now out there somewhere on planet earth. But does she look every bit as good as the hypothetically possible infinitely perfect and beautiful existential supremum ? And if such a girl literally and really did exists in real life and you were to meet her wouldn't that be literally "heaven on earth"?

But if not, can anyone guesstimate how close have we come? In your opinion what physical attributes, facial features, and physique would give rise to THE most perfectly beautiful girl/lady/woman ever? And what is an example of such a living human being even if she falls somewhat short of the mark? Which models, actresses, females in REAL LIFE (real names) comes close to what I am alluding to?


====





http://us.vdc.imdb.com/name/nm1721113/mediaindex]All Photos of Kristina Apgar



Last edited by bochen2; 10-12-2008 at 01:12 PM..
Reply With Quote
 
» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:52 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network