Quote:
Originally Posted by Pluto
We know what mainstream thinks.
You say "NO NEED"
|
I said that to your earlier comment -->
Than we can research into the recyling process without the need for the BBT or expansion or dark matter and so on.
There is "no need" of research as Big Bang is the prevailing theory.
Your article by Narlikar, Burbidge, etc is interesting yet is based upon earlier
work of Hoyle which is a Steady State Model. I respect their opinion, just
don't agree based upon what evidence I am aware. So do most other
Cosmologists that are in the field.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pluto
This limits research to explain the workings of star formation and galaxy evolution where we do have a cyclic process. Matter been sucked in and ejected and reforming not only matter but reforming stars and galaxies.
|
Maybe I was mistaken I thought the "recycling" you were referring to was
on a universal scale not Galactic or Stellar. I admit to not always staying up
with the most recent reserch.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pluto
You can always read up on star formation and the varies stages.
|
I graduated from Purdue in Physics (BS), though my original major Astrophysics at IU.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pluto
For many years we have had a restriction because of main stream thinking.
The idea was that we had a standard model, why do other research.
|
I wasn't even implying this. It may very well work out that Steady State
may be valid in the end. More evidence lies with Big Bang as far as I am
aware of. Dark Matter has strong implication as well. Take, missing mass,
gravitational lensing issues, etc. Don't take my word -- look up author
Lawrence Krauss of Case Western University. He has a book "Quintessance".
maddog
