|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: A Theory on Egypt...
i didn't say they didn't have a drive, i simply said that from the looks of some of the evidence, i couldn't even really examine, never been to egypt, it looks as thought they had tools that can easily surpass the most advanced rock cutting tools of our day. So much of it just does not seem to make any sort of sense, from a perspective of someone who understands the difficulties in that kind of resource processing, someone who likes to think outside of the box that any guide out there would put you in, like the unfinished obelisk, they say men with round rocks were cutting into the rock to create what we see, but what we see is a perfectly cut obelisk, sharp edges, perfect faces, etc, being seeming cut out by a bunch of people with small round rocks, which, to my knowledge, would be so extremely hard to do, that it would be simpler to develop the technology to do this and then cut the faces, then sit there with round rocks and do this, without a slightest hint of a mistake, or a slightest imperfection on 3 of the 4 surfaces, it makes one wonder, was it really that ancients used techniques that were so-proposed by these people, or did we not find out how they did it, and we stick with what cave men did to make their spears...?
----------------
Microsoft, the leader in using innovative tactics to promote irksome experience, coupled with antiquated technology that's held together by a pyramid of makeshift afterthoughts.
Apple, the leader in using irksome tactics to promote innovative experience, coupled with an antiquated core that's enhanced by state-of-the-art afterthoughts.
Linux, the leader in not using any tactics to promote user-defined experience, coupled with state-of-the-art core enhanced by innovative afterthoughts.

|